Is This Marleah in 1870?

I have been searching for Layton & Marleah in census records prior to the 1875 NY State Census. I had no luck searching on the family name Kanistanaux. I decided to try just “Marleah” in an 1870 census search. I was surprised and very pleased to find a possible candidate.

DOCUMENT

1870_RondoutNY_Marleah

1870 U.S. Census, Rondout, NY, Pg. 162

EXTRACTED DATA

Key Data

1870 U.S. Census, Rondout, Ulster Co., NY, Pg. 162, dated 13-Jul-1870.
Dwelling #768, Family # 1301, Hotel kept by John Lasher

  1. U-ta-wa-un, 36, male, Indian, Doctor, $6000 real estate, $2000 personal property, b. California, citizen
  2. Marleah U-ta-wa-un, age 36, female, Indian, wife of above, b. California

DISCUSSION

Well, some of my readers will question this being Layton & Marleah Kanistanaux, and I certainly do question it myself. But I can’t overlook the possibility either.
First, Marleah is not a common name. Second, they are both Indian, and the man is a doctor. Third, the ages are in the right ball park.
Of course there is the rather obvious negative fact they both claim to be born in California, which is not a match to what I know about Layton & Marleah.
In this census, Marleah is not called a doctress, but she is referred to as the wife of the Doctor. Should I believe this 100% and should I believe they are both from California? I think not. I always greet information from Indian Doctors, basket makers, and other public entertainers with a large dose of skepticism. They are in the business of telling the “white” public what they want hear without regard to the validity of their tale.
If this man and woman are traveling together and sharing rooms, they would need to appear as husband and wife. It would be improper to the public eye if they were not married.
The census taker would most likely address the gentleman when asking questions. The census taker could have easily assumed she was his wife and came with him from California or U-ta-wa-un could have given that story to the census taker.
My next step will be to learn what I can about the name U-ta-wa-un, since it should be rather unique.
I won’t be adding this information to my data base until I learn more about the couple and can establish some foundation for believing this might are Layton & Marleah.

See the Kanistanaux Home Page for more.
Do you have any information to add or questions?
Please leave a comment.
Canyon Wolf 
Copyright ©2012 Ne-Do-Ba – All Rights Reserved
Advertisements
Categories: Analysis, Documentation, Entertainments, Family-Kanistanaux | Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Post navigation

2 thoughts on “Is This Marleah in 1870?

  1. Jon Pringle Essex, VT

    Is it possible the one named U-ta-wa-un generic for one from Ottawa?

  2. Thanks for the thoughts. An interesting possibility. Certainly anything is possible.

    However, it is way too early in the research process to start making guesses about this name. First, as a researcher, I should learn as much as possible about the man and see where it leads me. Once that is done, I will be able to formulate educated guesses – a much better use of valuable research time.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: